Claire Gothreau
October 2019

What do you work on?

My research agen­da is at the inter­sec­tion of Amer­i­can polit­i­cal behav­ior, polit­i­cal psy­chol­o­gy, and women and pol­i­tics. More specif­i­cal­ly, I study how our gen­der iden­ti­ty and the way in which we express that iden­ti­ty shapes how we inter­act with the polit­i­cal sphere.

“By being cheap­er, online research has had a democ­ra­tiz­ing effect on the field of polit­i­cal science.”

What is the most excit­ing piece of work or research you’ve ever done?

I’m very excit­ed about my dis­ser­ta­tion research. I explore the polit­i­cal con­se­quences of sex­ism, sex­u­al harass­ment, and objec­ti­fi­ca­tion. In my most recent study, I find strong evi­dence that sex­ist events spur polit­i­cal engage­ment, par­tic­u­lar­ly when paired with high lev­els of fem­i­nist iden­ti­ty development.

What did you do using Gorilla and what did you find?

My co-author (Dr. Vin Arce­neaux) and I used Gorilla to pro­gram an exper­i­ment that explored the con­nec­tion between mas­culin­i­ty threat and repro­duc­tive rights atti­tudes as mea­sured by a test of implic­it atti­tudes. We con­tribute to the grow­ing lit­er­a­ture on the mas­cu­line over­com­pen­sa­tion the­sis, which pur­ports that men react to mas­cu­line inse­cu­ri­ty with extreme and stereo­typ­ic demon­stra­tions of their gen­der identity.

In this project, we explore mas­cu­line over­com­pen­sa­tion as a pre­dic­tor of atti­tudes about repro­duc­tive rights and sex­ist atti­tudes. If the mas­culin­i­ty over­com­pen­sa­tion the­sis holds, it would be like­ly that in the face of threat­ened mas­culin­i­ty, men would express more con­ser­v­a­tive opin­ions about women’s repro­duc­tive rights and more sex­ist atti­tudes over­all. Our under­ly­ing ratio­nale is that that women hav­ing more auton­o­my over their bod­ies is anti­thet­i­cal to the stereo­typ­ic notion that men should con­trol women.

To prime a sense of “mas­culin­i­ty threat” we had par­tic­i­pants com­plete the Bem Sex Role Inven­to­ry, a com­mon mea­sure of gen­der iden­ti­ty. Par­tic­i­pants in the treat­ment group were given bogus feed­back that indi­cat­ed they scored in the aver­age range for some­one with the oppo­site gen­der iden­ti­ty. The pur­pose was to prime a sense of “gen­der threat.”

“Because of the intu­itive design, Gorilla made it much faster and eas­i­er for me to pro­gram my experiment.”

We found that those who are high in social dom­i­nance ori­en­ta­tion and were exposed to this treat­ment dis­played less sup­port for repro­duc­tive rights.

How did Gorilla make your life or research bet­ter, eas­i­er or faster?

Because of the intu­itive design, Gorilla made it much faster for me to pro­gram my exper­i­ment. When I ran into issues cre­at­ing an Implic­it Atti­tude Test, the folks at Gorilla were incred­i­bly helpful.

For you, what is the stand-out fea­ture in Gorilla?

For me, the stand-out fea­ture of Gorilla is how intu­itive and ver­sa­tile it is. Gorilla makes it easy to cre­ate the indi­vid­ual ques­tion­naires and tasks that you want to use in your exper­i­ment. When you’re ready to cre­ate your exper­i­ment flow, you sim­ply attach every­thing togeth­er in this very intu­itive way where you can send respon­dents down dif­fer­ent paths of using branch­es and randomizers.

How do you think online research is going to change your field?

I think online research has had a democ­ra­tiz­ing effect on the field of polit­i­cal sci­ence. Exper­i­men­tal research used to be done using lab and field exper­i­ments, which are both very expen­sive. The option to exe­cute exper­i­ments online has allowed more researchers to have this as an option in their method­olog­i­cal tool kit.

When you’re not work­ing what do you enjoy doing?

I enjoy play­ing ten­nis, eat­ing sushi, and hang­ing out with my family.

Claire Gothreau
PhD Candidate
Temple University
Political Behavior; Gender and Politics; Political Psychology

Ready to get started?

More Spotlight Interviews

Mircea Zloteanu

Mircea Zloteanu

[get-spotlight-info] "We showed that not all “posed” emotions are created equal, and that research needs to consider this for us to have an accurate picture of human emotion recognition." Continue Reading Mircea Zloteanu

Joseph Devlin

Joseph Devlin

[get-spotlight-info] "We ran an experiment in partnership with Audible, that investigated whether people respond differently to emotionally engaging scenes when they are delivered in video or audiobook format.” Continue Reading Joseph Devlin