Claire Gothreau
October 2019

What do you work on?

My research agenda is at the inter­sec­tion of Amer­i­can polit­i­cal behav­ior, polit­i­cal psy­chol­o­gy, and women and pol­i­tics. More specif­i­cal­ly, I study how our gender iden­ti­ty and the way in which we express that iden­ti­ty shapes how we inter­act with the polit­i­cal sphere.

“By being cheaper, online research has had a democ­ra­tiz­ing effect on the field of polit­i­cal science.”

What is the most excit­ing piece of work or research you’ve ever done?

I’m very excited about my dis­ser­ta­tion research. I explore the polit­i­cal con­se­quences of sexism, sexual harass­ment, and objec­ti­fi­ca­tion. In my most recent study, I find strong evi­dence that sexist events spur polit­i­cal engage­ment, par­tic­u­lar­ly when paired with high levels of fem­i­nist iden­ti­ty development.

What did you do using Gorilla and what did you find?

My co-author (Dr. Vin Arce­neaux) and I used Gorilla to program an experiment that explored the con­nec­tion between mas­culin­i­ty threat and repro­duc­tive rights atti­tudes as mea­sured by a test of implic­it atti­tudes. We con­tribute to the growing lit­er­a­ture on the mas­cu­line over­com­pen­sa­tion thesis, which pur­ports that men react to mas­cu­line inse­cu­ri­ty with extreme and stereo­typ­ic demon­stra­tions of their gender identity.

In this project, we explore mas­cu­line over­com­pen­sa­tion as a pre­dic­tor of atti­tudes about repro­duc­tive rights and sexist atti­tudes. If the mas­culin­i­ty over­com­pen­sa­tion thesis holds, it would be likely that in the face of threat­ened mas­culin­i­ty, men would express more con­ser­v­a­tive opin­ions about women’s repro­duc­tive rights and more sexist atti­tudes overall. Our under­ly­ing ratio­nale is that that women having more auton­o­my over their bodies is anti­thet­i­cal to the stereo­typ­ic notion that men should control women.

To prime a sense of “mas­culin­i­ty threat” we had par­tic­i­pants com­plete the Bem Sex Role Inven­to­ry, a common measure of gender iden­ti­ty. Par­tic­i­pants in the treat­ment group were given bogus feed­back that indi­cat­ed they scored in the average range for someone with the oppo­site gender iden­ti­ty. The purpose was to prime a sense of “gender threat.”

“Because of the intu­itive design, Gorilla made it much faster and easier for me to program my experiment.”

We found that those who are high in social dom­i­nance ori­en­ta­tion and were exposed to this treat­ment dis­played less support for repro­duc­tive rights.

How did Gorilla make your life or research better, easier or faster?

Because of the intu­itive design, Gorilla made it much faster for me to program my experiment. When I ran into issues cre­at­ing an Implic­it Atti­tude Test, the folks at Gorilla were incred­i­bly helpful.

For you, what is the stand-out feature in Gorilla?

For me, the stand-out feature of Gorilla is how intu­itive and ver­sa­tile it is. Gorilla makes it easy to create the indi­vid­ual ques­tion­naires and tasks that you want to use in your experiment. When you’re ready to create your experiment flow, you simply attach every­thing togeth­er in this very intu­itive way where you can send respon­dents down dif­fer­ent paths of using branch­es and randomizers.

How do you think online research is going to change your field?

I think online research has had a democ­ra­tiz­ing effect on the field of polit­i­cal science. Exper­i­men­tal research used to be done using lab and field exper­i­ments, which are both very expen­sive. The option to execute exper­i­ments online has allowed more researchers to have this as an option in their method­olog­i­cal tool kit.

When you’re not working what do you enjoy doing?

I enjoy playing tennis, eating sushi, and hanging out with my family.

Claire Gothreau
Picture showing a test glass PhD Candidate
Picture showing an university graduates hat Temple University
Picture showing a School Political Behavior; Gender and Politics; Political Psychology

Ready to get started?

More Spotlight Interviews

Mircea Zloteanu

Mircea Zloteanu

[get-spotlight-info] "We showed that not all “posed” emotions are created equal, and that research needs to consider this for us to have an accurate picture of human emotion recognition." Continue Reading Mircea Zloteanu