Bryony Payne
January 2020

Who or what orig­i­nal­ly inspired you to work in your field of research?

I’ve always been inter­est­ed in how we share our ‘selves’ with the world. Having started as an under­grad­u­ate in lin­guis­tics, I ini­tial­ly looked at how our lan­guage use inter­acts with our self-iden­ti­ty. Since then, my research has become more focused not on what you say, but how you say it, and how your voice itself is an impor­tant and pow­er­ful medium of self-representation.

What do you work on?

I’m inter­est­ed in voices and self-pro­cess­ing. My research asks ques­tions about how your voice makes you, ‘you’ and recent­ly I’ve been asking whether people can be given a new voice and incor­po­rate it into their self-concept.

What did you do using Gorilla, and what did you find?

We know that infor­ma­tion asso­ci­at­ed with our­selves is per­cep­tu­al­ly pri­ori­tised over infor­ma­tion asso­ci­at­ed with other people. That is, we tend to be faster and more accu­rate in per­ceiv­ing a self-related stim­u­lus than an other-related stim­u­lus, which is known as the self-pri­ori­ti­sa­tion effect. This effect has pre­vi­ous­ly been researched by Sui et al. (2012) using a per­cep­tu­al match­ing par­a­digm and, with Gorilla, we were here able to create an online version of this par­a­digm and test self-pri­ori­ti­sa­tion in voices for the first time.

In our tasks, people heard three unfa­mil­iar voices and learned who they belonged to by being told, for instance, ‘This voice belongs to you’, ‘This voice belongs to a friend’, and ‘This voice belongs to a stranger’. Once they’d learned the correct pair­ings, we pre­sent­ed dif­fer­ent com­bi­na­tions of a voice with an iden­ti­ty label, and asked par­tic­i­pants to judge whether it was a correct pairing, or not. If there is a self-pri­ori­ti­sa­tion effect, we’d expect to see that the voice belong­ing to them, the self-voice, would be judged more quickly and accu­rate­ly, rel­a­tive to either the friend-voice or the other-voice (Experiment 1).

Take a look at our study on Gorilla Open Materials

And that’s exactly what we found! It’s impor­tant to remem­ber, however, that it’s not their real self-voice! All the voices used in this par­a­digm are unfa­mil­iar to them before they start so this pri­ori­ti­sa­tion effect shows that the new self-voice has been per­ceived as more rel­e­vant to them than the others despite being equally unfamiliar.

To test what other factors could influ­ence this pri­ori­ti­sa­tion, we ran two further ver­sions of the same experiment on Gorilla. In Experiment 2, we gave par­tic­i­pants a new self-voice that was more similar to their real voice (i.e. gender-matched) while, in Experiment 3, we asked par­tic­i­pants to first choose which voice they wanted to become their new self-voice.

We found a self-pri­ori­ti­sa­tion effect in all three exper­i­ments. The impact of choos­ing your voice (Experiment 3) had a greater effect on self-pri­ori­ti­sa­tion than the sim­i­lar­i­ty of phys­i­cal prop­er­ties between voice and the par­tic­i­pant (Experiment 2).

“This pri­ori­ti­sa­tion effect shows that the new self-voice has been per­ceived as more rel­e­vant to them than the others despite being equally unfamiliar.”

Did you include any special fea­tures in your study to ensure good quality data? If so, what did you do?

We used a head­phone screen­ing (designed by Woods, Siegel, Traer & McDer­mott, 2017) to check people were using head­phones while doing the study remote­ly and so ensure the audi­to­ry stimuli were being heard prop­er­ly. We didn’t use atten­tion checks this time but did use exclu­sion cri­te­ria based on performance.

Has this study been published?

Our paper has been sub­mit­ted to a journal for peer review and a preprint is cur­rent­ly avail­able here.

“You’re limited only by what you haven’t yet realised you can do.”

What real-world problem do you see that your research could impact?

If you lose the ability to use your own voice (i.e. patients with motor neurone disease) it can be dam­ag­ing to your sense of self and make it hard to main­tain a social iden­ti­ty. By inves­ti­gat­ing what factors might aid the incor­po­ra­tion of a new, exter­nal­ly-gen­er­at­ed, voice into the self-concept, we hope to show that an alter­na­tive voice can quickly become self-rel­e­vant – espe­cial­ly when it has been chosen – and be sub­se­quent­ly pri­ori­tised in per­cep­tion. Our find­ings there­fore have impli­ca­tions on the design and selec­tion of indi­vid­u­at­ed syn­thet­ic voices that are used with assis­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion devices.

How do you think online research is going to change your field?

Quicker testing with higher recruit­ment numbers. Plus, as long as you take some data quality assur­ance mea­sures, such as atten­tion­al checks, an exclu­sion cri­te­ria and pilot­ing, you can get really good quality data, fast.

What is the biggest advan­tage of online research methods?

It’s so quick to collect data; once the study is live I can recruit and collect data from all par­tic­i­pants within a few hours!

Why did you choose Gorilla?

I’d first been intro­duced to Gorilla during my MSc and knew it was really flex­i­ble, avail­able for use with audi­to­ry stimuli, and ideal for linking to an online recruit­ment platform.

The flex­i­bil­i­ty that Gorilla pro­vides with such a simple build process is astound­ing! It’s so adapt­able to your require­ments and you’re limited only by what you haven’t yet realised you can do. If you ever come unstuck though, I’ve also found the Gorilla Support team to be remark­ably quick to help and provide solutions.

How did Gorilla make your life or research better, easier or faster?

I really appre­ci­at­ed how easy it was to share the experiment with others. It was handy for me to send it within Gorilla to col­leagues who could con­tribute to its con­struc­tion, to send it as an email link for people to pilot or, at test, to share it via a recruit­ment plat­form for quick data collection.

On a per­son­al level, what are you most proud of?

I’ve always wanted to do a PhD and have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to research some­thing I’m so inter­est­ed in. I’m very proud (and very grate­ful) to be where I am and also to be enjoy­ing it thanks to such a great lab team!

What advice would you give to someone start­ing out in behav­iour­al science/research?

Learn to code! I thought coding was a really niche skill, but it’s so widely applic­a­ble. Being able to code improved my data analy­sis, and gave me a valu­able trans­fer­able skill for industry.

I got started in R while analysing Gorilla data. Having designed every element of my Gorilla experiment, it’s was far easier to under­stand what my data should look like and helped me under­stand how the code was manip­u­lat­ing my data. I also tweaked my Gorilla set up using JavaScript, as I needed to delay the auto­play func­tion of an audi­to­ry stim­u­lus. So I used the Gorilla script­ing tools within the task builder.

I’ve learnt not to be intim­i­dat­ed by coding; turns out it’s fun once you’ve got started!

Bryony Payne
Picture showing a test glass Cognitive Neuroscience
Picture showing an university graduates hat PhD student
Picture showing a School Univeristy College London
Bryony Payne
Open Materials Links

View experiments, data and results

Ready to get started?

More Spotlight Interviews

Mircea Zloteanu

Mircea Zloteanu

[get-spotlight-info] "We showed that not all “posed” emotions are created equal, and that research needs to consider this for us to have an accurate picture of human emotion recognition." Continue Reading Mircea Zloteanu

Bryony Payne

Bryony Payne

[get-spotlight-info] "Our findings ... have implications on the design and selection of individuated synthetic voices that are used with assistive communication devices." Continue Reading Bryony Payne

Matthew Hunt

Matthew Hunt

[get-spotlight-info] "I used Gorilla to run a variant categorization task using a mixture of regular words, swearwords and legal non-words all ending with the morpheme ‘-ing’.” Continue Reading Matthew Hunt